CO2 enrichment: a safe supply of carbon to the plant
A plant changes carbon dioxide (CO2) into sugar. In strong light, a crop in a building can use much more CO2 than the air supplies. Added CO2 can increase the dry yield by approximately one third. The plant uses CO2 only in the light period, and in a ventilated room the exhaust air removes the CO2. At an incorrect concentration, CO2 can kill a person in the room. This paper gives the target range, the method to seal a room, and the safety limits and alarms to install before a person goes in.
Purpose and scope
A plant makes its structure from air. The carbon in each leaf, stem and flower is from carbon dioxide (CO2). The plant absorbs the CO2 from the room air. It uses the energy of light to make sugar from the CO2 and water.
If you give a canopy in bright light more CO2 than the approximately 420 ppm of usual air, the canopy can increase its rate of growth. Thus growers add CO2. But CO2 enrichment is one of the tasks in the room in which it is easiest to make a dangerous error.
The remaining sections of this paper give more information about these five facts. Add CO2 in the light period. Seal the room. Install a CO2 alarm on the wall. These three instructions are the most important.
Definitions
Evidence and limitations
We want each paper to be correct. Thus we examine each paper for information that is not solid. This information comes from the view of one grower, from a small number of sources, or from grower methods that have no controlled test. We identify this information, and we do not show it as solid.
Frequently there is no paper for the decision that you must make. Then we use the reports of other growers and the methods that work in the rooms that we know. This information can help you, but it is not the result of a laboratory test. Use the methods that work for your plants, for your room and for your meters. If a table does not agree with your crop, use the data from your crop and record the difference.
- In strong light, a higher CO₂ concentration increases the photosynthesis of C3 plants, for example cannabis.
- Inject CO₂ only when the light is on. Measure the CO₂ with NDIR sensors. The occupational limits are approximately 5,000, 30,000 and 40,000 ppm.
- A sealed room keeps the CO₂ enrichment. Exhaust removes it.
- Enrichment ranges of 1,000 to 1,500 ppm, and CO₂ from bottles, as the standard procedure in a sealed room.
- Methods of air exchange in the dark period and of ethylene control.
- One percentage of yield increase for all rooms. The genetics, the light and the quality of the seal have the largest effect.
- Maximum CO₂ values in percent for a drying room, as facts with no measurement. Measure your room.
- Percentage increases for tomato in a greenhouse, with the same values (1:1) for cannabis flower.
If you find an error, make a report. We will correct it. Make the report on GitHub, with the name of the paper and the information that is incorrect. If you have a source, include it: Make a report of an accuracy problem. The regulations, labels and licenses of your area always override each procedure in these papers. The label weak in a paper shows the points where the risk of an error is highest.
Photosynthesis in the leaf and the effect of the CO2 concentration
In a leaf in the light, an enzyme with the name Rubisco absorbs CO2 from the air and changes it into sugar. Rubisco does not absorb only CO2. It also absorbs oxygen. When Rubisco absorbs oxygen and not CO2, photorespiration starts. Photorespiration is a reaction that is a waste of energy and carbon. It does not make a product that the plant can use.
When the ratio of CO2 to oxygen increases, photorespiration occurs at a lower rate[2].
At this time, the air contains approximately 420 ppm of CO2[3]. This concentration is not sufficient for Rubisco to operate at the maximum rate. In a C3 plant, for example cannabis, the CO2 concentration is the limit for photosynthesis. When the CO2 increases, photosynthesis increases.
In the one primary investigation of gas exchange in cannabis, the CO2 increased from 350 to 750 ppm. The net photosynthesis of the leaf increased by approximately 50%[1]. A subsequent investigation of four cultivars with high THC found that the net photosynthesis increased by 38–48% when the CO2 increased from 390 to 700 ppm[4].
Photosynthesis has a maximum value. When the CO2 increases, the rate at which the leaf can use the light becomes the limit for photosynthesis. Thus the curve becomes horizontal at a saturation point. For most C3 crops in greenhouses, the horizontal part of the curve starts at approximately 1,000–1,300 ppm[7].
Photosynthesis and respiration in the light cycle
Persons who start CO2 enrichment frequently make an error with this fact. Photosynthesis is the reaction that uses CO2. It operates only in the light. Respiration is the reaction that releases CO2. It does not stop, day and night, in each living cell[8].
In the light period, photosynthesis absorbs much more CO2 than respiration releases. Thus the canopy has a net CO2 uptake. When the lights go off, photosynthesis stops and only respiration continues. Thus the same canopy has a net CO2 emission. At night, the rate of CO2 emission is much lower than the rate of CO2 uptake in the day.
The rate of respiration also increases when the temperature is higher. When the temperature increases by 10 °C (18 °F), the rate becomes approximately two times higher (a Q10 of approximately 2)[10]. In soil or coco, microbes and roots in the root zone also make more CO2. But these facts do not change the primary fact: the plant absorbs CO2 only while the lights are on. Because of this one fact, you add CO2 in the light period and do not add CO2 in the dark period.
CO2 uptake in the day and CO2 emission at night
Growers frequently think that the plant uses CO2 in the day and releases the same quantity of CO2 at night. The two quantities are not the same. The cause of this difference is the cause of the effect of CO2 enrichment.
The plant does not release again all the carbon that it absorbs in the light. In one growing season, respiration releases only approximately half of the carbon that photosynthesis absorbs. The remaining carbon, approximately 46%, stays in the plant as sugar, stem, leaf and flower[9]. Review papers on crop physiology give a range of 30–60% for the fraction that respiration releases[8].
This carbon in the plant is the crop. Thus the CO2 that the plant absorbs in the day is always more than the CO2 that it releases at night. The difference is the quantity of carbon that became plant tissue.
You can find this difference in a sealed room. When the lights are on and you do not add CO2, the canopy quickly decreases the CO2 in the air. The concentration becomes lower than the concentration of outdoor air. In a greenhouse with good seals, the CO2 can decrease to approximately 200 ppm in some hours. This low concentration decreases the photosynthesis of the canopy by approximately 26%[11].
During the night, the CO2 in the same room increases again, because the respiration of the plants releases CO2. But the CO2 increases slowly. The CO2 does not increase to a high value, because the room has leaks.
This balance gives the primary information about the quantity of CO2 that is necessary. CO2 enrichment is not for the night. It keeps the CO2 high in the light hours. Without CO2 enrichment, the canopy removes most of the CO2 from the room.
CO2 targets and the effect on the yield
The best yield data for cannabis come from controlled tests at Utah State University. In these tests, the CO2 concentration of a sealed room increased from the concentration of outdoor air (approximately 420 ppm) to approximately 1,200 ppm. The dry flower yield increased by approximately 40%. The concentration of 1,200 ppm gave approximately 95% of the possible yield gain. Thus a higher concentration gives almost no more yield[6].
Other crops in greenhouses show the same result. Many C3 crops in greenhouses have a yield gain of ten percent or more at approximately 800–1,200 ppm (the very high yield gains in reports change with the control treatment, which can have a low CO2 concentration, and with the system)[7]. For most C3 crops, the saturation point is approximately 1,000–1,300 ppm[7].
CO2 supply and dose
There are four usual methods to put CO2 into a room. One method is clearly the best for a sealed cannabis room:
| Method | Operation | Information |
|---|---|---|
| Compressed CO2 in a cylinder | Cylinder → regulator → solenoid valve. An NDIR controller operates the valve. | This method is more clean than the other methods. It makes no heat and no unwanted products, and it is accurate. We recommend that you use it for sealed rooms. A cylinder becomes empty, thus you must replace it. |
| Propane or gas burner | The burner burns fuel to make CO2 (approximately 3 lb of CO2 for each lb of fuel) | The cost of the gas is low, but the burner adds heat and water vapor. If the fuel does not burn fully, the burner makes carbon monoxide (CO), ethylene and NOx. These gases cause damage to plants and injury to persons. A CO alarm is necessary. |
| Fermentation with yeast | Sugar + yeast → CO2 + alcohol | The output is very small, and you cannot control it. This method is only for hobby growers. |
| Dry ice | Solid CO2 changes directly into gas | You cannot control it. It continues for a short time. It also causes a risk of cold burn and a risk in a confined space. |
CO2 is heavier than air, thus it flows down. Install the supply pipe above the canopy. Use horizontal airflow (HAF) fans to mix the CO2 down. The fans decrease the thickness of the boundary layer at the leaf (a layer of air without movement and with a deficit of CO2)[14].
Sealed rooms and ventilated rooms
In a ventilated room, most of the cost of the CO2 is waste. An exhaust fan replaces the air of the room with outdoor air of approximately 420 ppm. Thus the CO2 that you added decreases to the concentration of the outdoor air. The CO2 decreases in a curve. When the CO2 in the room is higher and the air changes at a higher rate, the CO2 decreases more quickly. If the exhaust fan and the CO2 supply operate at the same time, the exhaust fan removes the CO2 that you add.
A room with the fans off also has leaks. Measurements in commercial greenhouses show that more than half of the CO2 that the growers added went out through leaks in the structure. The CO2 use efficiency was less than 50–60% at a setpoint of 1,000 ppm[12].
Thus a sealed room is necessary for CO2 enrichment. Do not remove the heat and the humidity with exhaust air. Control them in the room. Use a recirculating mini-split air conditioner (AC) for the heat and a dehumidifier for the moisture. Thus the door stays closed and the CO2 stays in the room.
| Ventilated room | Sealed room | |
|---|---|---|
| Heat and humidity | Exhaust air removes them from the room | The AC and the dehumidifier remove them in the room |
| CO2 enrichment | The exhaust air removes the CO2, and the enrichment has no effect | The room keeps the CO2. Thus the enrichment has an effect. |
| Air exchange | High. There are many air changes for each hour. | Low. The air changes only through leaks. |
| When to use it | Use when you add no CO2, or only to prevent low CO2 in the day | Use for all CO2 enrichment where the result is important |
Air exchange in sealed rooms
You seal the room to keep the CO2 in the room. Then you must let outdoor air come in. The two instructions have opposite effects. Carbon filters and HEPA filters clean the air all the time. Thus a grower can think that an air exchange is not necessary.
Filters clean the air, but they do not replace it. The waste gases that the plants make cause most of the stale air. Heat and moisture also cause stale air. A carbon filter and a HEPA filter remove almost no part of the waste gases, the heat or the moisture.
The table shows the items that these filters remove and the items that they do not remove:
| Filter | Removes | Does NOT remove |
|---|---|---|
| HEPA | Particulates ≥0.3 µm: mold spores, dust and pollen (99.97%)[25] | All gases, water vapor, heat, CO2, ethylene and oxygen |
| Activated carbon | Odor, and heavy VOCs and terpenes. Adsorption on the carbon removes them. | CO2, humidity, heat and oxygen. Carbon holds ethylene only weakly, and it becomes full[26]. |
The gas that makes an air exchange necessary is ethylene (C2H4). It is a plant hormone. The plants make it and release it. They release a small quantity all the time. They release much more when they have stress or wounds, after defoliation, or in the flowering stage[30].
In a sealed space, the ethylene increases because of the plants only. NASA sealed a chamber with wheat, soybean, lettuce and potato plants. The ethylene increased to 40–120 ppb. The plants made all this ethylene. This concentration was sufficient to cause a change in the shape of the wheat that you can see[30].
In a controlled test on tomato, a stable 20 ppb decreased the fruit yield to approximately half, and 40 ppb decreased it by approximately 90%. At the same time, the foliage showed almost no damage[31]. Ethylene also has an effect on cannabis. Cannabis has a full ethylene signaling system. The system is very sensitive. Thus ethylene changes the sex of the flower[32].
Ethylene is the primary cause for an air exchange, but stale air also has these items:
- Humidity. The roots of a plant move water up through the stems, and the water moves out of each leaf as vapor through small pores (stomata). This movement is transpiration. Transpiration moves most of the water that you irrigate out of the plant[34]. A dehumidifier removes this vapor, and a filter does not. After the lights go off, the vapor continues to come if the transpiration is more than the dehumidifier can remove.
- Heat. The air conditioner removes the heat. The carbon filter does not remove it.
- The terpenes of the plants and other VOCs. Carbon catches them for some time. When the carbon is full, they go through it.
- Mold spores. A HEPA filter on the recirculation loop decreases the number of spores in the air[38], but it cleans only the air that flows through it. In the inner part of a thick canopy, the humidity is 15–25% higher than the reading of your room sensor[35]. This area of air without movement and with high humidity is where bud rot starts. An air exchange, and air movement through the canopy, decrease the disease. A filter on the average air of the room is not sufficient[36] (the mold paper and the airflow paper give more information).
Do an air exchange that is sufficient to keep the ethylene and the humidity low. It must not remove too much CO2 or dry the media. Closed plant environments have from less than 1 to approximately 15 air changes for each hour. One investigation of cannabis micropropagation found that approximately 4.4 air changes for each hour gave the best result. A higher rate dries the substrate and causes stress to the plants[37] (that investigation was at plantlet scale. Thus the value is an indication, not a setpoint for a flower room). A sealed room is not a room without air exchange.
Room conditions with CO2 enrichment
A change of the CO2 concentration causes changes in the other conditions of the room. The grow-room systems paper gives the same fact: the inputs of a room change at the same time. Three other conditions change with the CO2:
| Lever | Effect of high CO2 | Procedure |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | The best temperature for the plant increases by some degrees[13] | If the light is strong, use approximately 28–30 °C (82–86 °F) and not approximately 25 °C (77 °F). The photosynthesis of cannabis has its peak at approximately 30 °C (86 °F)[1] |
| Stomata and water | High CO2 closes the stomata in part (the pores of the leaf for gas exchange). It decreases the stomatal conductance (how easily vapor moves through the pores) by approximately 42%. It decreases the leaf transpiration by approximately 29% for each leaf[1] | Each leaf uses less water. The total quantity of water that the crop uses can decrease, stay the same or increase. It changes with the leaf area, the PPFD, the temperature and the VPD (VPD is the capacity of the air to absorb moisture. When the temperature is higher and the humidity is lower, the air removes water from the leaf more quickly.) Measure the quantity of water that the crop uses. |
| Light | No effect if the light is not high[5] | Use CO2 enrichment only in rooms with strong light. In other rooms, the CO2 is waste. |
| Feed | When there is less transpiration, the concentration of salts at the root can increase | Monitor the runoff EC and adjust the feed strength |
High CO2 concentration in drying rooms
A drying room has conditions that are opposite to the conditions of the flower rooms in this paper. You fill a sealed room with a large mass of biomass that you cut, from ten kilograms to many hundred kilograms. The room has no light and low airflow. The biomass continues respiration for days after the harvest. It releases CO2 all the time, and there is no photosynthesis to absorb the CO2 again[15].
Cut leaf and flower have a high rate of respiration. After the harvest, they are in the same group as leafy greens and cut herbs. A high temperature increases the rate (the same Q10 of 2 again)[15].
A drying room at 15–18 °C (59–64 °F) with almost no air movement is a CO2 trap that holds almost all the CO2. In sealed greenhouses with plants, the CO2 concentration increases at night to 600–1,000 ppm or more because of the living plants[11]. A room with much cut biomass and almost no airflow can have a much higher concentration. The concentration can be many thousand ppm. In the worst conditions, in a room without airflow, it can possibly increase to a concentration that you measure in percent.
CO2 exposure limits and worker safety
If you read only one section of this paper, read this section. Your CO2 enrichment setpoint of 1,000–1,500 ppm is much less than each worker limit. It is safe for a person who stays in the room for a short time.
The risk is in these conditions: a regulator with a leak, or a room with too much CO2 from the supply. Other conditions are a burner fault and a sealed drying room. Each of these conditions can cause a CO2 concentration that kills a person, and you get no indication of it.
Each primary safety authority gives the same limit. The limit for the 8-hour average CO2 concentration that a worker can breathe is 5,000 ppm (0.5%). These authorities are OSHA in the US[17], NIOSH and ACGIH[18], and WorkSafe New Zealand[19]. When the concentration is more than this limit, the effects increase quickly:
| CO2 concentration | Effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| approximately 420 ppm | Usual outdoor air | Baseline[3] |
| 1,000–1,500 ppm | Usual enrichment target. It is safe for short tasks. | 3 to 5 times less than the worker limit |
| 1,000–2,500 ppm | Some reports show small effects on cognition. The reports do not agree with each other. | An effect on cognition. It is not dangerous[20] |
| 5,000 ppm (0.5%) | 8-hour worker exposure limit (TWA) | OSHA / NIOSH / ACGIH / WorkSafe NZ[19] |
| 30,000 ppm (3%) | The 15-minute short-term limit (STEL). A person has a headache and breathes quickly. | NIOSH / ACGIH / WorkSafe NZ[18] |
| 40,000 ppm (4%) | IDLH, immediately dangerous to life or health | A person cannot easily go away from the area[18] |
| 50,000 ppm (5%) | Hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis in approximately 30 min | The CO2 is directly poisonous. It is not only low oxygen[16] |
| 70,000–100,000 ppm (7–10%) | Unconsciousness occurs in some minutes | A person cannot do self-rescue[16] |
| >300,000 ppm (>30%) | Loss of consciousness occurs in seconds | In accidents that killed persons, the CO2 was 14–26%[16] |
CO2 sensors, alarms and the limits of MQ sensors
You cannot control CO2, and you cannot be safe from CO2, if you do not measure it. Many sensors that you can get do not measure CO2. The correct sensor type is NDIR (non-dispersive infrared). It reads the CO2 from its infrared signature[22].
Vendors give the name ‘CO2 sensors’ to low-cost ‘MQ’ metal-oxide sensors. These sensors are not correct. The table shows this:
| Sensor | Does it measure CO2? | Result |
|---|---|---|
| NDIR (SCD30, SCD41, MH-Z19 and other models) | Yes. It uses infrared light for CO2 only. | Correct for control and for safety[22] |
| MQ-135 | No. It calculates an ‘equivalent CO2’ from a mixture of VOCs. | The reading is not a correct CO2 value. Do not use it[23] |
| MQ-5 | No. It is for LPG and for gases that can burn. | It is for a different gas[23] |
Two sensors, two tasks. Install a control sensor at the height of the canopy. This sensor controls the CO2 at the setpoint. Install a second sensor low on the wall, approximately 30 cm (12 in) from the floor. This sensor is for the safety of persons. CO2 collects near the floor.
For larger systems, the International Fire Code (Section 5307) makes this mandatory. Each installation with more than 100 lb of CO2 must have gas detection. The system gives an alarm at 5,000 ppm and a strong alarm at 30,000 ppm. It also stops the CO2 supply automatically and starts the exhaust airflow[21]. Also for installations with less than this quantity, an alarm and an occupancy interlock give protection at a low cost.
Expected results and limitations
In a sealed room with strong light, CO2 enrichment is one of the changes that give the largest yield gain for the cost. In all other rooms, the cost is waste[24]. The cost of the gas is low. The payback changes with the condition of the room.
- The room is sealed (AC and dehumidifier, not exhaust)
- The light is strong (high PPFD and DLI)[5]
- The temperature, the water and the feed are correct
- The room has a CO2 alarm and interlock
| Problem | Possible cause | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| More CO2, but the yield is not higher | The light is too low, or the room is not sealed | Increase the PPFD. Seal the room. Do this before you think that the gas is the cause. |
| The CO2 does not stay at the setpoint | The room has leaks, or the exhaust fan operates when you add CO2 | Seal the leaks. Use the exhaust only at lights-off. |
| The plants show wilt, or the substrate stays wet | Plants with CO2 enrichment have a lower transpiration rate. The irrigation quantity that you used before the CO2 enrichment is too high at this time. | Adjust the VPD. Decrease the irrigation volume[1] |
| Damage to the leaves when you use a burner | The fuel does not burn fully. The burner makes CO, ethylene and NOx. | Do maintenance on the burner. Install a CO alarm. Or use CO2 from a cylinder. |
| The sensor reading becomes lower in some weeks | ABC causes an incorrect calibration in a sealed room | Do not use ABC. Calibrate the sensor manually[22] |
Read the grow-room systems paper, the airflow paper and the harvest and dry paper with this paper. CO2 enrichment gives a good result only as part of the full system.
References
- Chandra S, Lata H, Khan IA, ElSohly MA (2008). Photosynthetic response of Cannabis sativa L. to variations in photosynthetic photon flux densities, temperature and CO2 conditions. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 14(4):299-306. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3550641/
- Tolbert NE, Benker C, Beck E (1995). The oxygen and carbon dioxide compensation points of C3 plants: possible role in regulating atmospheric oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92(24):11230-11233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.24.11230
- NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (2024). Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide, global monthly/annual means (2024 global mean 422.8 ppm). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/global.html
- Chandra S, Lata H, Khan IA, ElSohly MA (2011). Photosynthetic response of Cannabis sativa L., an important medicinal plant, to elevated levels of CO2. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 17(3):291-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-011-0066-6
- Rodriguez-Morrison V, Llewellyn D, Zheng Y (2021). Cannabis yield, potency, and leaf photosynthesis respond differently to increasing light levels in an indoor environment. Front. Plant Sci. 12:646020. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8144505/
- Westmoreland FM (2023). Environmental Physiology of Medical Cannabis. PhD dissertation, Utah State University (Bugbee Crop Physiology Lab): CO2 enrichment to 1,200-1,400 ppm raised dry flower yield ~40%. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd2023/243/
- Doddrell NH, Lawson T, Raines CA, Wagstaff C, Simkin AJ (2023). Feeding the world: impacts of elevated [CO2] on nutrient content of greenhouse-grown fruit crops and options for future yield gains. Horticulture Research 10(4):uhad026. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhad026
- Amthor JS (2024). After photosynthesis, what then? Importance of respiration to crop growth and yield. Field Crops Research 321:109638. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429024003915
- Collalti A, Prentice IC (2019). Is NPP proportional to GPP? Waring's hypothesis 20 years on. Tree Physiology 39(8):1473-1483 (mean NPP:GPP ~0.46). https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz034
- Atkin OK, Tjoelker MG (2003). Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends in Plant Science 8(7):343-351 (respiration Q10 ~2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00136-5
- Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board (AHDB). CO2 enrichment: best-practice guide (a sealed glasshouse can fall to ~200 ppm, cutting canopy photosynthesis ~26%). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://horticulture.ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/co2-best-practice-guide-background
- Wang X, Lv J, Shi X, et al. (2022). CO2 enrichment in greenhouse production: towards a sustainable approach. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1029901 (CO2 use efficiency below ~50-60% from leakage). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1029901
- Lv Z, Zhu Y, Liu X, et al. (2022). Elevated [CO2] raises the temperature optimum of photosynthesis and thus promotes net photosynthesis of winter wheat and rice. Physiologia Plantarum 174(6):e13757. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13757
- Kitaya Y, Shibuya T, Yoshida M, Kiyota M (2004). Effects of air velocity on photosynthesis of plant canopies under elevated CO2 levels. Adv. Space Res. 34(7):1466-1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.031
- Kader AA, Saltveit ME (2002). Respiration and gas exchange. In Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops, 3rd ed. Univ. of California ANR Publication 3311. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8q37j80t
- Permentier K, Vercammen S, Soetaert S, Schellemans C (2017). Carbon dioxide poisoning: a literature review of an often forgotten cause of intoxication in the emergency department. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 10:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-017-0142-y
- US OSHA. Annotated Permissible Exposure Limits, Table Z-1, carbon dioxide (CAS 124-38-9): PEL 5,000 ppm 8-hour TWA. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.osha.gov/annotated-pels/table-z-1
- US NIOSH / CDC. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards and IDLH documentation, carbon dioxide: REL 5,000 ppm TWA, STEL 30,000 ppm, IDLH 40,000 ppm; 1 ppm = 1.80 mg/m3. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/124389.html
- WorkSafe New Zealand (2025). Workplace Exposure Standards and Biological Exposure Indices, 15th ed., carbon dioxide: WES-TWA 5,000 ppm, WES-STEL 30,000 ppm. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.worksafe.govt.nz/topic-and-industry/monitoring/workplace-exposure-standards-and-biological-exposure-indices/all-substances/view/carbon-dioxide/
- Azuma K, Kagi N, Yanagi U, Osawa H (2018). Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: a short review on human health and psychomotor performance. Environment International 121:51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.059
- International Code Council (2021). International Fire Code, Section 5307, carbon dioxide systems: gas detection alarming at 5,000 ppm (low) and 30,000 ppm (high) for installations over 100 lb CO2, with automatic shutoff and ventilation. (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://codes.iccsafe.org/s/IFC2021P2/part-v-hazardous-materials/IFC2021P2-Pt05-Ch53-Sec5307.3.2
- Sensirion. SCD30 / SCD4x NDIR CO2 sensor datasheets and SCD30 field-calibration application note (ASC/ABC assumes periodic exposure to ~400 ppm fresh air). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://sensirion.com/products/catalog/SCD30
- Zhengzhou Winsen Electronics. MQ-135 and MQ-5 metal-oxide gas sensor datasheets (MQ-135 infers equivalent-CO2 from mixed VOCs; MQ-5 targets LPG / combustible gas). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.winsen-sensor.com/d/files/MQ-5.pdf
- Oklahoma State University Extension. Greenhouse carbon dioxide supplementation (HLA-6723). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/greenhouse-carbon-dioxide-supplementation.html
- US EPA. What is a HEPA filter? A HEPA filter removes at least 99.97% of airborne particles at 0.3 um (particulates only, not gases). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/what-hepa-filter
- Souza et al. (2024). Ethylene elimination using activated carbons impregnated with copper oxide. Molecules 29(12):2717 (plain activated carbon held ~1,111 ug ethylene/g; ethylene kinetic diameter ~3.9 A). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122717
- Alvarez-Hernandez MH, et al. (2024). Postharvest handling of ethylene with oxidative and absorptive means (review). PMC10933227 (KMnO4 scrubbers ~40-80 mg ethylene/g, irreversible; activated carbon 11-78 mmol/kg; photocatalytic TiO2/UV). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10933227/
- Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME (1992). Ethylene in Plant Biology, 2nd ed. Academic Press (response threshold ~10 ppb; half-maximal response 0.1-1 ppm).
- Cornell University Greenhouse Horticulture. Ethylene in the greenhouse: symptoms, detection and prevention (chronic damage from ~10 ppb; acute epinasty/abscission/chlorosis above 0.1 ppm). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://greenhouse.cornell.edu/crops-culture/ethylene-in-the-greenhouse-symptoms-detection-prevention/
- Wheeler RM, Peterson BV, Sager JC, Knott WM (1996). Ethylene production by plants in a closed environment. Advances in Space Research 18(4-5):193-196 (sealed NASA CELSS chamber reached 40-120 ppb ethylene from plant emission alone; visible wheat epinasty). https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)00877-h
- Hudelson TJ, et al. (2023). Elevated atmospheric ethylene and high temperature independently inhibit fruit set but not vegetative growth in tomato. HortScience 58 (continuous 20 ppb cut fruit yield to 37-51% of control; 40 ppb to 4-11%; vegetative growth reduced <10%). https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/58/3/article-p247.xml
- Monthony AS, et al. (2026). Sex-specific ethylene responses drive floral sexual plasticity in Cannabis sativa. The Plant Journal (cannabis has an intact, sensitive ethylene-signalling pathway).
- US OSHA. 29 CFR 1910.146, permit-required confined spaces: an oxygen-deficient atmosphere is below 19.5% O2 (normal air is ~20.9%). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.146
- HPAC Engineering. Latent loads matter: HVAC for cannabis grow facilities (transpiration returns most irrigation water to room air as vapour, the dominant dehumidification load; filters do not remove it). (source not from a journal, for example from a manufacturer). https://www.hpac.com/industrial/article/21270796/latent-loads-matter-hvac-for-cannabis-grow-facilities
- Zhang D, et al. (2020). Substantial differences occur between canopy and ambient climate: quantification of interactions in a greenhouse-canopy system. PLoS ONE 15(5):e0233210 (in-canopy RH ~15-25% higher than surrounding air). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233210
- Baptista FJ, et al. (2012). Effect of nocturnal ventilation on the occurrence of Botrytis cinerea in Mediterranean unheated tomato greenhouses. Crop Protection (ventilation that lowers humidity reduced grey mould).
- Liang J, et al. (2026). CO2 and air-change-rate optimisation in photoautotrophic micropropagation of medicinal Cannabis sativa. Industrial Crops and Products (~4.4 air changes/hour optimal at 800 ppm CO2; higher exchange dried the substrate). Plantlet-scale.
- Punja ZK, Collyer D, Scott C, Lung S, Holmes J, Sutton D (2019). Pathogens and molds affecting production and quality of Cannabis sativa L. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6811654/
The Cannabis White Papers · CC BY-NC 4.0 · version 1.2 · updated 2026-07-18